Library suggestions for leaders — Bible

booksI’ve been asked by several people to suggest some helpful reading on various ministry- related topics. Here’s an attempt at the books I most highly recommend in these areas, along with some that have come most highly recommended to me.

I write this with many of my own leaders in mind, so these lists assume I’m talking to bright, interested people, but not scholars or seminarians, necessarily. With that, I’m looking for works that I can feel confident putting in the hands of most of my people.

These suggestions are intended to give you a start. I’m not providing a full analysis here. Take a look at their tables of contents, sample some pages, and read some reviews to get a better feel for which is right for you. And, of course, I’m happy to talk to you more about what you’re looking for and what might be best.

Understanding the Biblical Narrative

For an introduction to the larger narrative of Scripture — something to give you a better handle on how the whole Scripture story weaves together, these two books will serve you very well:

Those are relatively short works. For a more detailed introduction, take a look at Introducing the Bible by John Drane. It’s big (736 pp.), but very reader friendly. You can also use the OT and NT sections in this as your introductory surveys for those areas.

Old Testament

For a general introduction to the Old Testament, these two books are where I’d start:

Relating the Old Testament to modern Christian ethical concerns is an ongoing challenge. If you’re dealing with those concerns, I’d suggest Old Testament Ethics for the People of God by Christopher J. H. Wright. It’s another big book, but very accessible. And though it’s worth reading front to back, you can also use it to just read up on a particular area.

New Testament

Whereas the Old Testament setting spans centuries – millennia even – the New Testament setting spans only a few decades. Because of that, it has been a bit easier for people to ask what “the setting” of the New Testament was. I’d go to a few books to help me understand that setting:

For a more standard survey of the New Testament, I might start with Mark Allan Powell’s Introducing the New Testament: A Historical, Literary, and Theological Survey.

And for all those tough ethical conundrums (divorce and remarriage, homosexual practice, abortion, violence, women in ministry) that we go to the New Testament hoping to understand, the book to go to is The Moral Vision of the New Testament: A Contemporary Introduction To New Testament Ethics by Richard Hays. He says you should read it in order – not jumping to the specific topics – and it’s probably better that way, but I think some of the individual chapters on various topics are quite good on their own. And his five pages on sharing possessions in the conclusion are perhaps the best part of the whole book.

General Bible Study

We struggle to understand how to go about reading and studying the Bible. Fortunately, there are some books out that I think are outstanding resources:

There’s a running start at some resources concerning the Bible. I’ll have future posts on theology, pastoral care, worship, discipleship & spiritual formation, Church history, and church & society issues. I’d love to hear your thoughts or questions about this list or future lists.

Disclaimers

  • I have read most, but not all of these. Those I haven’t read, I’ve skimmed through enough and heard enough good things from trusted people that I can recommend them with confidence.
  • All Amazon links are affiliate links. Feel free to buy wheresoever you please.

You need a class meeting, and an update of “The Nature, Design, and General Rules of the United Societies”

united societiesI’ve written before on 4 questions to ask and be asked every week. I participate in a group that asks each other those questions – or something to get at the same – each week. It has been the single most important practice I’ve kept as part of my Christian growth in the past two years. See those questions in “How is it with your soul?” and “2 more questions to ask and be asked every week.”

Those questions, and the groups we’re asking them in, stem from a very early Methodist practice called the “class meeting.” A practice that was at the heart of the Methodist movement/explosion in 18th century England and then in America. A practice that The United Methodist Church has all but forgotten today. A practice that I think could be incredibly life-giving for you, and full of potential for renewal in the church.

A document called “The Nature, Design, and General Rules of the United Societies” is the best, most concise account of how those class meetings developed and the accountability that came along with them. I think it can shed a lot of light on the nature and purpose of these groups and the four questions I think we should all ask and be asked every week.

As usual, it’s in old King James style English, which makes it tough to get through. So I’ve worked on an update. Find it below. Or see a copy of the original here. Enjoy!

—————

The Nature, Design, and General Rules of the United Societies

Near the end of the year 1739 eight or ten people came to John Wesley in London. They appeared to be deeply convicted of sin and longing for redemption. They asked, as did two or three more the next day, if he would spend some time with them in prayer, and advise them how to flee from the coming wrath, which they saw continually hanging over their heads. So he might have more time for this important work, he set a time when they might all come together — Thursday evening — which from then on they did every week. To these, and as many others as desired to join them (they grew daily in numbers), he gave the advice which he judged they most needed, and they always concluded their meeting with prayer according to their needs.

This was the rise of the United Society, first in Europe, and then in America. Such a society is nothing other than “a company of people having the form and seeking the power of godliness, united in order to pray together, to receive the word of exhortation, and to watch over one another in love, that they may help each other to work out their salvation.”

To more easily discern whether they are truly working out their own salvation, each society is divided into smaller companies, called classes, according to where they live. There are about twelve people in a class, one of whom is designated the leader. It is his/her duty:

  1. To see each person in the class once a week at least, in order: (1) to inquire into their spiritual state; (2) to counsel, correct, encourage or urge on, as the occasion may require; (3) to receive what they are willing to give toward the relief of the preachers, the church, and the poor.
  2. To meet the ministers and the stewards of the society once a week, in order: (1) to inform the minister of any that are sick, or of any that are idle or disruptive and will not be corrected; (2) to pay the stewards what they have received from their classes that week.

There is only one condition required for admission into these societies: “a desire to flee from the coming wrath, and to be saved from their sins.”

But wherever this desire is really fixed in someone’s soul, it will be shown by its fruits.

It is therefore expected of everyone who continues in the societies that they should continue to evidence their desire of salvation,

First: By doing no harm, by avoiding evil of every kind, especially that which is most generally practiced, such as:

  • Misusing the name of God.
  • Desecrating the day of the Lord, either by doing ordinary work on it, or by buying or selling.
  • Drunkenness: buying or selling distilled liquors, or drinking them, unless in cases of extreme necessity.
  • Slaveholding; buying or selling slaves.
  • Fighting, quarreling, brawling, one brother taking another to court; repaying evil with evil or insult with insult; not treating others as ourselves in buying or selling.
  • Buying or selling goods without paying appropriate taxes.
  • Giving or taking things on usury—i.e., unlawful interest.
  • Unkind or useless conversation; particularly slandering or heaping abuse on rulers or on ministers.

Doing to others what we would not have them do to us.

Doing what we know is not for the glory of God, such as:

  • Wearing gold or expensive clothes.
  • Being diverted by entertainment that cannot be used in the name of the Lord Jesus.
  • Singing those songs, or reading those books, that do not lead to the knowledge or love of God.
  • Softness and needless self-indulgence.
  • Storing up treasure on earth.
  • Borrowing without a probability of paying; or taking goods without a probability of paying for them.

It is expected of everyone who continues in these societies that they should continue to evidence their desire of salvation,

Secondly: By doing good; by being in every way merciful according to their ability; as they have opportunity, doing good of every possible sort, and, as far as possible, to all people:

To their bodies, with the strength God provides, by giving food to the hungry, by clothing those needing clothes, by visiting or helping those that are sick or in prison.

To their souls, by instructing, correcting, or encouraging anyone we have any communication with; trampling under foot that extreme doctrine that “we are not to do good unless our hearts are willing to do it.”

By doing good, especially to those who belong to the family of believers or are groaning to belong to it; employing them in preference to others; buying from one another, helping each other in business, and all the more because the world will love its own and them only.

By all possible diligence and frugality, so that the gospel will not be discredited.

By running with perseverance the race marked out for them, denying themselves, and taking up their cross daily; submitting to bear disgrace for the sake of Christ, to be as the scum of the earth, the garbage of the world; and expecting that people will falsely say all kinds of evil of them because of the Lord.

It is expected of everyone who desires to continue in these societies that they should continue to evidence their desire of salvation,

Thirdly: By being devoted to all the commands of God; such are:

  • The public worship of God.
  • The ministry of the Word, either read or explained.
  • The Lord’s Supper.
  • Family and private prayer.
  • Searching the Scriptures.
  • Fasting or abstinence.

These are the General Rules of our societies; all of which we are taught to observe by God in his written Word, which is the only rule, and the sufficient rule, both of our faith and practice. And we know God’s Spirit writes all these rules on truly awakened hearts. If there are any people among us who do not observe them, who habitually break any of them, let it be known to the ones who keep watch over that person as those who must give an account. We will warn them of the error of their way. We will put up with them for a season. But then, if they do not repent, they will have no more place among us. We have absolved ourselves.

I’ve also been slowly working toward updates of Wesley’s standard sermons. Find that work here.

The catch-22 of change and bureaucracy

Yes!

Yes!The phrase Catch-22″ comes from Joseph Heller’s amusing and disturbing book  about World War II. The book introduces that phrase in reference to how someone (a man named Orr, in this case) can get out of combat duty.

“Is Orr crazy?”

“He sure is,” Doc Daneeka said.

“Can you ground him?”

“I sure can. But first he has to ask me to. That’s part of the rule.”

“Then why doesn’t he ask you to?”

“Because he’s crazy,” Doc Daneeka said. “He has to be crazy to keep flying combat missions after all the close calls he’s had. Sure, I can ground Orr. But first he has to ask me to.”

“That’s all he has to do to be grounded?”

“That’s all. Let him ask me.”

“And then you can ground him?” Yossarian asked.

“No. Then I can’t ground him.”

“You mean there’s a catch?”

“Sure there’s a catch,” Doc Daneeka replied. “Catch-22. Anyone who wants to get out of combat duty isn’t really crazy.”

There was only one catch and that was Catch-22, which specified that a concern for one’s own safety in the face of dangers that were real and immediate was the process of a rational mind. Orr was crazy and could be grounded. All he had to do was ask; and as soon as he did, he would no longer be crazy and would have to fly more missions. Orr would be crazy to fly more missions and sane if he didn’t, but if he was sane he had to fly them. If he flew them he was crazy and didn’t have to; but if he didn’t want to he was sane and had to. Yossarian was moved very deeply by the absolute simplicity of this clause of Catch-22 and let out a respectful whistle.

You should read the book.

A pastor friend from another state called me today frustrated about bureaucracy in the church. He referenced my article on “Why the UMC is dying a (somewhat) slow death.” He had agreed to join a committee, went to lots of meetings, made some big decisions… Then it all got undone. Why the wasted time?

The quote that was most devastating: “I’ve said some crazy things, but that might be why I don’t have any influence. [thoughtful pause…] That’s the game: you have to choose between having influence and speaking up. You’re only allowed influence if you don’t pose a risk of shaking things up too much.”

Is he right? This may apply to bureaucracies far outside the church.

Do most of the bureaucrats get where they are by not posing too many threats to the system?

And can you change the system from a top-down level without becoming one of the bureaucrats?

That’s some catch-22. Be moved deeply by its absolute simplicity.

And so again, beware the suggestion that you can make major change within the bureaucracy.

Ask these questions first:

  • How many others have to approve it before it happens?
  • Where are you in the pecking order?
  • Have they reached absolute crisis level?

Unless your answers to those three questions are respectively, “very few,” “the very top,” or “definitely,” beware.