The local church’s competition

church competitionThe most-mega of Lexington’s mega-churches opens a new satellite campus this weekend. For many in our congregation, their new campus is much closer and more convenient than their main campus is.

I’ve had some people ask me if I’m concerned about it; if I’m concerned about “closer competition”; if I’m worried that we might lose people to the big, bad mega-church.

On a similar note, a popular book on church stewardship came out a few years ago with a new definition of “competition.” The first paragraph of the book tells how the number of non-profits in America doubled in the last ten years. Then it says, “What these numbers show is that in ten years the competition has nearly doubled.” The rest of the book is about how to get people to give your church more money when competition for charitable dollars is so stiff. (My conference actually encouraged all of its pastors to read that book.)

According to those who asked me about the mega-church, the local church’s competition is other churches.

According to that popular book on stewardship, the local church’s competition is all other non-profits – church and non-church alike.

Friends and colleagues, let’s please not miss this:
The church’s competition is sin, injustice, and heresy!

So long as other local churches aren’t teaching heresy or condoning sin, they’re our allies. That mega-church people have asked me about has made some great strides in the battle against injustice, both in Lexington and around the world. Years ago, one of my closest friends began taking his faith seriously as a result of their ministry. They’re allies, not competition.

And the children’s hospital, the blood center, the homeless prevention center… Competition? Really?!? For Christ’s sake! Literally. Surely we see these as great allies!

Scarcity and Abundance

I think those who see the the non-profit charity banquet and the church down the street as competition are operating out of a scarcity mentality: there are only so many Christians with only so much money to go around.

If our concerns are as petty as getting people to our church rather than the one down the road, getting people to give to us rather than the shelter for battered women, is it any wonder that the American church is in decline?

Here’s the truth: there is an abundance of competition out there. There’s no shortage of evil in this world.

And there is an abundance available from God to go out into our world and fight back. If you don’t have enough money to do something worthwhile, it’s not because the blood center took it all.

So mega-church, grace and peace to you. I hope your new campus this weekend has an encouraging start. We need your help. Darkness covers the earth. We need the light you’re providing.

Children’s hospital, homeless prevention center, para-church youth outreach, grace and peace to you. Thank you for identifying some particular places that need a special outreach and witness and giving them your full attention. We need you.

Church – and especially church leaders – how about offering the gospel more and spending less time on these petty issues?

And a small note to the other side

I’m remembering some conversations I’ve had about “the Reformed folk kicking our tails.” There are some secondary “competitions” within the Church, and I think they’re okay and healthy.

So for instance, I believe every church should be celebrating weekly Eucharist – and in a meaningful, not half-baked kind of way. But those who don’t (which, as it turns out, includes that mega-church)? I still consider them friends – just in need of some more persuading – not foes!

I believe in Wesleyan theology. It has been life-changing for me. I believe it’s better and truer, richer and deeper than Reformed (often called “Calvinist”) theology. I wish it would be taught better, proclaimed more boldly, available in more resources. In that, yes, the Reformed folk are kicking our tails. But on the whole, the Reformed, the Pentecostals, the Roman Catholics, the independent evangelicals, yes, even the Dispensationalists, are allies, not competition. If any of them start a new church down the street, I wish for their success.

If I really believe a church or non-profit is doing more harm than good (e.g. the infamous Westboro Baptist), then they’re at best mis-guided allies, or perhaps outright evils that need to be combatted. The best I can wish for them is serious reform, or to go away. But those are the rare exceptions, certainly not the rule.

Right now, the ones that concern me the most are those whose Christianity is so shallow and mis-guided that they wake up each day to do battle against those villainous children’s hospitals and mega-churches.

Was this helpful or interesting to you? If so, JOIN my e-mail update list.

Shortcuts to studying Scripture – and why they take longer

inductive bible studyA note for anyone hoping to hear a word from God when studying Scripture – whether for personal study or for preaching and teaching: The shortcut often ends up being the long road.

An example from my own sermon preparation… Sometimes when I feel like time has been cut short and I need quick inspiration from the text, I skip my own study of the text and jump straight to secondary sources: commentaries, other articles and sermons on the same text, etc. Whenever I do this, I usually find myself reading commentary after commentary, sermon after sermon, looking for a nugget that hits home and is something I can work off of.

On the other hand, when I devote myself to actually studying the text – putting pen to paper, asking my own questions about what a particular word means or why a certain sentence structure is used – inspiration usually comes pretty quickly.

Then I go to those secondary resources with a purpose: to see if anyone else is seeing what I’m seeing, or can help give me a bit more context to understand it, or can tell me I’m way off base. When I go to the commentaries this way, I read sections I would have otherwise glazed past with great enthusiasm and interest. Now I know what I’m looking for help with – not just looking for something.

The Bible is an amazing book. The living word of God. I consistently find that when I approach it that way, I’m blown away.

Seminary-trained people, this is nothing new for you, right? You heard it time after time: “Do your own work, then go to the commentaries.” But you break the rules sometimes, don’t you? And usually because you’re out of time or energy. And unless you’re very different from me, I think it ends up costing you time – or enthusiasm about what you’re preaching – in the long run. You spend the time you would have spent doing your own study searching for someone else to give you something to say. And a lot of times it never becomes your own – you never internalize it. And that shows when you try to teach or preach it. Well, at least that’s how it works for me.

Some people struggle with how to go about studying the Bible on their own. I know it was a problem for me in the past. Without question, the most helpful method for me is “Inductive Bible Study” (IBS). If you’ll devote yourself to it, I think this method will blow your Bible reading wide open. Rather than try to explain IBS myself, let me point you to a good introduction someone else has put together, and then recommend a few resources.

IBS – An Overview

Check out this helpful and informative post by Eric Evans. It’s a good overview, with videos and all. IBS: An Overview and IBS: Step by Step

That was a nice overview, but don’t stop there. You should really take a look at these below.

IBS 101

Bible Study That Works by David Thompson.

If you’re not looking for academic-level reading, this is where I think you should start. Thompson makes IBS easy to understand and will show you its value. In just over 100 pages, he’ll teach you how to be a much better student of Scripture.

201

Inductive Bible Study: A Comprehensive Guide to the Practice of Hermeneutics by David Bauer and Robert Traina.

If you’re serious about IBS, this is the ultimate resource. It’s 350 pages, and you better be ready to seriously commit. But if you do, it will change your study. Traina is the grandaddy of IBS and Bauer is his favored son. There’s a lot to learn from them!

301

This isn’t necessarily Inductive Bible Study, but what I would consider an essential aid if you’re really serious about your study. You’ve got to learn the languages! My greatest moments of awe this week, as I prepared to preach Isaiah 60, came while translating. If you’re not reading the Greek and Hebrew, you’re missing a great depth and richness and nuance that no translation can fully capture. Seriously, consider it.

My own experience: finding a way to do inductive language learning (learning by being immersed in the Scriptures – very small bits at first – rather than starting with lots of memorization and tables) was much more enjoyable and helped me see much more quickly how important it is to know the languages.

For you who aren’t vocational pastors and aren’t seminary-trained: don’t think you can’t learn the languages, too. Elementary-aged children used to learn Greek, Hebrew, and Latin. Some still do. You can do it, too!

If you’re interested and want more resource suggestions, I’d love to talk. If you begin reading and implementing any of these, I’d love to hear about your experience.

All links are affiliate links to Amazon. Feel free to buy or borrow wherever you choose.

John Wesley’s Sermons for Today

wesley preachingNow Published:

  1. Salvation by Faith
  2. The Almost Christian
  3. Awake, Thou That Sleepest

Interested in more? JOIN my e-mail update list!

When I enrolled in seminary, I was pretty outspoken about the required course that I was least interested to take: “John Wesley’s Theology for Today.”

My general complaint went something like this: “We already had a Messiah, and it wasn’t John Wesley. We already have the Word of God, and it didn’t come to us in the 18th century.” (For what it’s worth, I still agree with those statements!) I felt like the emphasis on Wesley was a bit excessive.

But I’ll happily admit my mistake now. In all of my studies, John Wesley’s teaching – especially that in his Standard Sermons – has affected my faith and life more than any other teaching outside the Bible. In Wesley’s sermons, I discovered a deeper faith and a better understanding of the Scriptures than ever before. Wesley opened Scripture to me in a way that made God’s grace more profound and far-reaching than I had ever realized. He showed me a call to life in God that was at once more disciplined and more joyful than anything I had previously imagined. (See more at “Why I Love Wesleyan Theology.”)

I want more people to experience that.

At the same time, I know the language/grammar barrier has been a major obstacle to some people. I’ve urged friends and church members to read Wesley, and they came back saying they just couldn’t get through it. Wesley’s rhetorical style is often complex. Add to that a King James style of English, and it’s at least one too many obstacles for most people to plow through.

I don’t want to tamper much with Wesley’s rhetoric. It’s charming and convincing if you can get into it. Note: I’m not trying to take Wesley all the way to a “Message” Bible sort of translation. Where his rhetoric and arguments are complex, I’ve tried to preserve that complexity rather than paraphrase it. That means it’s still rather tough sledding in places. But I’ve worked over the last several years to remove some of the language/grammar obstacles for my friends. I’m hoping to slowly work through all of Wesley’s standard sermons to provide a more accessible version.

(Note: I know this has been done and published before. I still think there’s a place for a new “translation,” and certainly for a freely accessible one. If you would like a very good print version, I can highly recommend to you John Wesley on Christian Beliefs Volume 1: The Standard Sermons in Modern English Volume 1 and the other 2 volumes in that set, by Ken Kinghorn [affiliate link]).

To the general public:

I hope you’ll try some of these out. The language is hopefully easier, but the reasoning and topic matter can still be complex and deep. Read slowly! If you just glaze over these, I think you’ll miss the brilliance of what these sermons hold.

As you read, I’d love to talk about what you’re seeing. Do you have questions? Things that still don’t make sense? Or objections? I’d love to hear from you.

To the Wesley scholars:

My aim has been to “translate” Wesley into an NIV style of grammar and language while preserving his message and approach. As with all translations, this has required some of my own interpretation. Are there any places where I’m distorting or misrepresenting Wesley? Are there places that could be altered to be more understandable? I’d like to put these in a form useful for preaching today (as I’ve done with “Salvation by Faith”) or for small group reading and discussion (as I’ve done with several of the ones forthcoming).

I’d love your help. Consider these an early rough draft for some crowd-sourcing revisions. My version of “Salvation by Faith” is publicly available for comment on Google Docs right here. Please make editorial comments there, not on my blog. I’d like to reserve the blog post for discussion about the sermon’s content.

And if any of you have made similar translations of any of Wesley’s standard sermons, I’d love to see them.

Now Published:

  1. Salvation by Faith
  2. The Almost Christian
  3. Awake, Thou That Sleepest